����������

Despite opposition from pro-public school legislators, the Idaho School Boards Association and public sector unions, the Idaho House passed a bill on Wednesday specifically designed to silence ���������� members.  

Wednesday’s vote on , introduced by Rep. Judy Boyle (R-Midvale), was 40-29, after the House State Affairs Committee endorsed the bill on Monday. Rep. Ted Hill (R-Eagle) abstained from voting on the House floor, claiming he could not vote because he is a member of a union. The bill now likely heads to the Senate State Affairs Committee for consideration.  

“This wasn’t the outcome we wanted, but we’re not done fighting this bad bill yet,” said ���������� Political Director Chris Parri. “We’ll need all hands on deck to kill it for good in the Senate when the time comes.”  

HB 98 attacks teachers’ unions directly but does not apply to other public sector unions such as the Professional Fire Fighters of Idaho or the Fraternal Order of Police. The bill would:  

• End paid release time for educators and force them to use personal leave for union work (currently, ���������� locals can negotiate with their school district for leave to do union work)  

• Eliminate payroll deduction as an option for paying union dues (scroll down for information about ���������� AutoPay)

• Prohibit school districts from offering stipends intended to be used for paying union dues or fees 

• Bar school districts and schools from providing educator contact information to the union unless the employee provides authorization 

• Ban distribution of union communication materials or membership solicitations on school property 

• Limit compensation or paid leave for professional employees to engage in ���������� activities 

Wednesday’s floor debate on HB 98 was short but punchy, with several public education allies pointing out the many benefits of collaboration between school districts and ����������. Rep. Jack Nelsen (R-Jerome) talked about how school districts save money on HR departments by allowing union members to handle personnel issues internally.  

Rep. Josh Wheeler (R-Ammon) objected to the bill because it overreaches into educators’ constitutional right to peacefully assemble. “You know, this is one of those national solutions that has come looking for a problem or an issue that really does not exist in Idaho,” Wheeler said.  

Several other legislators, like Rep. Lori McCann (R-Lewiston), argued against targeting educators. “I think the teachers have taken enough of a hit,” McCann said before adding HB 98 is “not an Idaho bill.”  

Rep. Wendy Horman (R-Idaho Falls), who has brought forward a stunningly unaccountable voucher bill against stiff opposition from ����������, objected to McCann’s characterization. House Speaker Mike Moyle (R-Star) shut down McCann’s comments.  

“I will move on,” McCann said. “But I do not think that this is the Idaho Way. This is not how we want to do things.”  

Other legislators speaking out against the bill, including ���������� member Rep. Soñia Galaviz (D-Boise), said the union is being targeted for its political efforts. Other public sector unions are not targeted in HB 98.  

“The double standard feels like discrimination,” Galaviz said. “This is political targeting.”  

Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud

The reasoning behind that political targeting was on full display in Monday’s House Affairs Committee meeting, where the bill advanced to the House floor despite stiff public opposition. Lawmakers were transparent about their dislike of ����������’s affiliation with the National Education Association and NEA’s support of Democratic candidates.  

“I’m looking at this website,” said Rep. Bruce Skaug (R-Nampa), referring to the NEA’s website, “and it looks like it’s all about DEI, promoting DEI.” 

Rep. Clint Hostetler (R-Twin Falls) was even more blatant and inaccurate, saying “teachers’ unions, overwhelmingly — to the point of about 95 percent — have contributed to the Democrat party.”  

���������� Political Director Chris Parri’s committee testimony against the bill pointed out the truth: ���������� is non-partisan and includes members from both the Republican and Democratic parties. During 2024’s general election, as is typical, ���������� members endorsed a bi-partisan slate of candidates.  

In his testimony, ���������� Executive Director Paul Stark pointed out the flaws in creating legislation designed specifically to attack certain groups.  

“There’s a large issue here with what’s called ‘viewpoint discrimination’ under the Constitution,” said Stark, an attorney. “This legislation appears, again, to target only the ���������� because it doesn’t approve of its viewpoints.” 

Unions, Administrators Speak Out for ���������� 

Standing united in opposition were the Professional Fire Fighters Association, the AFL-CIO and some members of the Fraternal Order of Police. They packed the committee room, forcing legislative staff to hurriedly open another room for overflow.  

Shaun Laughlin of PFFI defended release time in his testimony, saying that union members serve essential functions — functions legislators could see if they removed the “stigma of being a union representative.”  

In addition, education allies from the Idaho School Boards Association and the Idaho Association of School Administrators voiced their concerns over the bill. Andy Grover of IASA said his organization had a long history of neutrality about union-related legislation, but HB 98 had galvanized their opposition.  

“We’re all true believers in local control,” he said. “This bill will strip our ability to manage our finances and our employee relations.”  

“It was very heartening to see the support from our allies and our union brothers and sisters,” ����������’s Parri said. “Their presence shows that we have strong backing. This is one of the strengths of the labor movement — we’re there for each other when it counts.” 

---

Protect Your Union: Switch to ���������� AutoPay

One of the best ways ���������� members can limit the impact of House Bill 98 on their union is by switching to ���������� AutoPay. 

HB 98 includes a provision that would prohibit school districts from allowing union members to pay their union dues by payroll deduction — with the intent to shrink membership and weaken the union. It’s a union-busting tactic that has had success in states like Tennessee, Florida, Kentucky and Arkansas. 

���������� Autopay is a proactive effort to protect the union from this attack — assuming HB 98 is approved by lawmakers and signed into law by Gov. Brad Little. 

“Every member that doesn’t switch to ���������� AutoPay leaves our union vulnerable,” said ���������� President Layne McInelly. “By switching to ���������� AutoPay, members can remove this threat altogether. We need our members to help protect their union, so their union can protect them.” 

Designed to be simple and easy, switching to ���������� AutoPay only takes a few minutes and does not add any additional fees to your membership dues. To complete the switch, members will need their membership number and the ZIP code on file with ����������. Members will also need their banking information (routing and account numbers) or credit card information. Please email autopay@idahoea.org with any questions about converting or your membership number. 

PLEASE NOTE: Members who switch to ���������� AutoPay before March 31, will continue on payroll deduction until April 1, 2025. In the meantime, your card information will be securely stored and will automatically transfer to ���������� AutoPay on April 1.